Independent researchers around the world have expressed concern:
Quant genius Dr. Jessica Rose wrote two recent Substack articles describing the impact of these changes on her research:
Dr. Clare Craig was matching VAERS reports to MHRA reports — this will no longer be possible going forward.
And these are just the researchers we are already aware of. There are likely many more.
Here at OpenVAERS we have questions for the unnamed figures behind the curtain who are making these unilateral decisions:
• You claim that "European regulators" requested this change? Please share that request with the public.
• You claim that the foreign VAERS reports "may not comply with European regulations." Please name the regulations you are referring to and the ways in which this reporting process "may not comply" in your view.
• What other data in your possession is not being shared with the public? It appears that you maintain "two sets of books" — the actual reports that only you can see and then arbitrarily truncated reports that you share (after a long delay) with the public.
• Who is in charge of VAERS? Who makes the decisions about what data to leave in, what data to leave out, and when to release data to the public?
The decision to remove this European/UK data from VAERS adds insult to unprecedented vaccine injury. It is nearly impossible to draw clear conclusions from data that are being intentionally withheld and manipulated behind the scenes. This failure of transparency is contrary to scientific norms and will further erode public trust in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the CDC.
Thank you for sharing this information with others.
The OpenVAERS Team