Source: VAERS.HHS.GOV
VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.
The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA’s multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as “safety signals.” If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same scientific limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.
Key considerations and limitations of VAERS data:
VAERS data available to the public include only the initial report data to VAERS. Updated data which contains data from medical records and corrections reported during follow up are used by the government for analysis. However, for numerous reasons including data consistency, these amended data are not available to the public.
COVID 19; COVID 19; This is a spontaneous report received from contactable reporter(s) (Consumer or other non HCP). The reporter is the patient. A 34-year-old male patient received BNT162b2 (BNT162B2), on 15Apr2021 as dose 1, single (Lot number: Ew0162), on 06May2021 as dose 2, single (Lot number: Ew0165) and on 13Dec2021 as dose 3 (booster), single (Lot number: Fj1611) at the age of 34 years for covid-19 immunisation. The patient's relevant medical history included: "Obesity" (unspecified if ongoing); "Sleep Apnea" (unspecified if ongoing); "Anxiety" (unspecified if ongoing); "Regalin with an intolerance to seafood" (unspecified if ongoing). The patient's concomitant medications were not reported. The following information was reported: VACCINATION FAILURE (medically significant), COVID-19 (medically significant), outcome "unknown" and all described as "COVID 19". Therapeutic measures were taken as a result of vaccination failure, covid-19. The patient started Paxlovid (lot Fy9918) on 04Jun2022 as COVID 19 treatment.
Open in Wayback Machine
(If this is a foreign report without a description you will be able to read the description in the Wayback Machine on Medalerts if the report became public for the first time before November 18, 2022.)
| Name | Dose # | Type | Manufacturer | Lot | Route | Site |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COVID19 (COVID19 (PFIZER-BIONTECH)) | 3 | COVID19 | PFIZER\BIONTECH | fj1611 |
| RECVDATE: | 06-10-2022 | RPT_DATE: |
| CAGE_YR: | |
| CAGE_MO: | |
| DIED: | U |
| DATEDIED: | |
| L_THREAT: | U |
| ER_VISIT: | |
| HOSPITAL: | U |
| HOSPDAYS: | |
| X_STAY: | U |
| DISABLE: | U |
| RECOVD: | U |
| LAB_DATA: | |
| V_ADMINBY: | |
| OTHER_MEDS: | |
| CUR_ILL: | |
| HISTORY: | Medical History/Concurrent Conditions: Anxiety; Obesity; Seafood allergy; Sleep apnea |
| PRIOR_VAX: | |
| SPLTTYPE: | USPFIZER INC202200809417 |
| FORM_VERS: | |
| TODAYS_DATE: | 06-09-2022 |
| BIRTH_DEFECT: | U |
| OFC_VISIT: | U |
| ER_ED_VISIT: | U |
| ALLERGIES: | |
| V_FUNDBY: |
Questions? Comments? Bugs?
[email protected]
Due to the high volume of inquiries, please be patient with response times.
AND PLEASE read the FAQ first.
OpenVAERS is a private organization that posts publicly available CDC/FDA data of injuries reported post-vaccination. Reports are not proof of causality.